alexr_rwx: (Default)
Alex R ([personal profile] alexr_rwx) wrote2006-11-08 04:52 am

elections two-kay-six!

*waves little flags*

Okay, that'll do :) Democrats up in the house, alright. Now just get a spine and a conscience, you feckless twits!

(Florida got another republican governor, but apparently Charlie Crist is a pretty moderate guy, not completely on the party line (and not angrily homophobic probably because he is a gay himself?) and mom seems to think he was an okay dude in highschool?)

Oh. Wait, the polling's not done yet. We'll see about the Senate when the results come all the way in!
ext_110843: (pace)

[identity profile] oniugnip.livejournal.com 2006-11-08 08:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes. But should voting be just a way to lodge a complaint in a possibly-risky way "oh man, I can't stand this guy, I'ma vote for Ralph Nader" ? A lot of people don't do that, because it's risky! You might accidentally get W elected! Or would it be better to be able to vote with what you really think and get some sort of proportional representation for the minority? There's probably nowhere bigger than a neighborhood in the US where the majority of the population is Libertarian... but spread out across the country, there's probably enough where it would make sense for them to be represented by a Representative or two. And their (misguided) voices go unheard, legislatively speaking.

Of course, entrenched parties wouldn't go out of their way to help set this up. Coke and Pepsi don't want RC Cola to bring more competition to the market.