hamburgers, the world, and English bishops. (or "bishies", but that's something different)
- You should read this article. It's about food, and how it's produced. It's like a very small version of Fast Food Nation. Slow Food for a Dying Planet.
- It pisses me off that this sort of thing (or most things) is politicised, becoming "left versus right". We expect, I think fairly commonly, that there are actual things, actually happening in an objectively-extant Real World... but descriptions of these Externally Happening Events are dripping in spin, and it's very difficult to even think of what it might mean for them not to be. I mean, when you encode a description of an event, you necessarily have a perspective on it. If only by the doppler effect. But damnit, there's a real world, and "people dumping crap into rivers" and "climate change" and "people dying in hard-to-pronounce places" and "people getting really fat and unhealthy, or else maimed in cow-processing places" are not partisan issues!! Economics should not be partisan! Biology and cosmology should not be partisan in the slightest!! *growls, pops knuckles, eyes dart around...*
- Marty
samarin and I are working on a language that uses no symbols or syntax, and relies entirely on context/pragmatics.
- Before I started thinking about politics and the fucked-up-ness of the world (or at least of human relationships), I was having a lot of fun, as evidenced by our earlier discussion about making up silly symbol-free languages. Also, I'm going to reject Bayesian probability theory and become a Frequentist. Your "relative degree of belief" dogma is degenerate and childish, O you Bayesians!
- It pisses me off that this sort of thing (or most things) is politicised, becoming "left versus right". We expect, I think fairly commonly, that there are actual things, actually happening in an objectively-extant Real World... but descriptions of these Externally Happening Events are dripping in spin, and it's very difficult to even think of what it might mean for them not to be. I mean, when you encode a description of an event, you necessarily have a perspective on it. If only by the doppler effect. But damnit, there's a real world, and "people dumping crap into rivers" and "climate change" and "people dying in hard-to-pronounce places" and "people getting really fat and unhealthy, or else maimed in cow-processing places" are not partisan issues!! Economics should not be partisan! Biology and cosmology should not be partisan in the slightest!! *growls, pops knuckles, eyes dart around...*
- Marty
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
- Before I started thinking about politics and the fucked-up-ness of the world (or at least of human relationships), I was having a lot of fun, as evidenced by our earlier discussion about making up silly symbol-free languages. Also, I'm going to reject Bayesian probability theory and become a Frequentist. Your "relative degree of belief" dogma is degenerate and childish, O you Bayesians!
no subject
It'll be grand. :D
(Though -- reading post-cataclysmic fiction like The Handmaid's Tale and The Dark Tower scares me even more than looking at present-day politics, because it shows us what we might become. Gives us a conclusion to look at, so to speak.)
no subject
I don't see how the issue can be anything but politicized. Politics is all about crafting morality into policy in a convincing way. Your view that "maiming cows" or "dumping crap into rivers" or people "getting fat" is wrong is your opinion and people disagree with you. I disagree with you. And I don't think that the government should do anything about it.
no subject
But for the large part, you're probably right. Or something. Or maybe the stars are burning out...
no subject
no subject
I imagine that construction has a lot of the same problems, although it seems like (from reading Atlanta Latino) the construction workers are more organized and have a better handle on things... and while roofing tar isn't super-pleasant, the Harsh Chemicals involved in cleaning abbatoirs are, I gather, Less Pleasant.
no subject
no subject
It's been a problem for > 2000 years. It's not going away anytime soon, sorry.
no subject
I guess my point rested in the use of the word "should." Noone should be murdered either. There are ways of reducing murder and there are ways of reducing partisanship.
no subject
Most of the worlds' population of humans (and lifeforms probably, will gain firsthand knowledge of annihilation. Things will grow again.
I see no enlightened society in the future. But the idea that humans will not always be on this lovely planet....that excites me.
no subject
I stll maintain that all events have a 50% chance of occurring-- either they do or they don't.
"Live from the People's Republic"