alexr_rwx: (coffee)
[personal profile] alexr_rwx
1) The first class is aesthetic: you may find the whole enterprise uninteresting, dry, yucky, or overly focused on the bizarre western/phallogocentric/dualistic notion of the observer as separate from an objectified environment.

2) The second class of problems has just one member: it is the state of affairs in which not all published articles are freely available online from the personal homepage of the author.

Date: 2006-05-01 10:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sault.livejournal.com
So, into which class goes the problem of infinite hypotheses?

Date: 2006-05-01 11:01 am (UTC)
ext_110843: (looking home)
From: [identity profile] oniugnip.livejournal.com
Stop being so analytical!!

Seriously, though, it seems we handle this one by intuitive, heuristic means... it's maybe not so much of a problem as Pirsig makes it out to be; somehow, we still make decisions, even given the staggering number of options available to us. Given an infinite number of hypotheses, what will you have for breakfast today?

Date: 2006-05-01 05:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gtv42.livejournal.com
Given an infinite number of hypotheses, what will you have for breakfast today?

Damn you. IHOP's syrups were giving me enough trouble already.

Date: 2006-05-01 06:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] samarin.livejournal.com
Wasn't his confusion about how we make this decision?

Now, I don't think we need to build a school of philosophy to solve this problem. It seems pretty obvious that the biological process inside our heads generate some small set of possible hypotheses and we pick the one that satisfies us (chemically, I suppose).

Pirsig wants to connect the chemical satisfaction in our brains and some innate "quality" in the object (sometimes a concrete object, sometimes something abstract). I don't understand why this must exist and it seems hard to defend.

As an aside, I'm tired of people demanding that aesthetically pleasing things be propped up by some sort of quality or otherwise subjective measure (deemed objective by Those Who Know). I want to like things because I like them, not because people call them art or because they were taken upside-down, at night and with a ridiculous f-stop.

Also, the cat is flatuating.

Profile

alexr_rwx: (Default)
Alex R

May 2022

S M T W T F S
1234 567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 15th, 2025 06:31 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios