alexr_rwx: (lizard brain)
[personal profile] alexr_rwx
Nobody can kiss me today, because I'm sick. Sorry, LADIES! My father, I think, would describe this feeling as "having some gook in his throat".

However! Brett [livejournal.com profile] zip4096 and Martin [livejournal.com profile] samarin and I hung out in the afternoon, and it was pretty exciting :) And last night was for karaoke with the Let's Try This! people, at International Bowl, which is a super-interesting place with signs in various Asian languages (and, if I recognized it correctly -- graffiti in the bathroom in Korean) and delicious fried rice. A lot of songs by Journey were sung.

And Graham [livejournal.com profile] cola_fan found this really awesome web comic, about "romance, sarcasm, math, and language". (it's right up my alley, and I expect, O dear readers, that it's up yours too.) Here are a few of my favorites.

Summer camp for high school kids starts again on Monday -- hopefully I'll be all recovered for that. I think I prefer the kids and the python to the adults and the java, but it's always good getting more experience teaching people stuff.

Date: 2006-07-09 05:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rusty42.livejournal.com
one day, when you grow up, they let you use C.

Date: 2006-07-09 05:57 am (UTC)
ext_110843: (Default)
From: [identity profile] oniugnip.livejournal.com
*grins* I think it should go the other way 'round, actually.

Object references are a convenient lie. People should understand pointers before they're introduced to Java.

Date: 2006-07-09 06:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rusty42.livejournal.com
why? it's impossible to use pointers in 100% Pure Java(TM). you may as well say, "people should understand garbage collection before they're introduced to java".

on the other hand, it *is* possible to use assembly from C.

but this isn't the reason assembly is taught immediately before C at teh CoC. the reason is so that C can gradually be redefined as a 'low-level' language, just like assembly -- after all, they're taught in the same class. and then they can both be thrown out, since they're 'no longer relevant'.

Date: 2006-07-09 07:28 am (UTC)
ext_110843: (juggling)
From: [identity profile] oniugnip.livejournal.com
... I think I see what you're getting at, but it seems like a needless siege mentality -- who's trying to say that writing C is no longer relevant?

I mean, no one language is for everything. And there are a lot of programs getting written out in the wild.

Date: 2006-07-09 07:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rusty42.livejournal.com
i think the writing is on the wall (http://www-static.cc.gatech.edu/academics/threads/threads/) for C at teh CoC.

Date: 2006-07-09 05:39 pm (UTC)
ext_110843: (Default)
From: [identity profile] oniugnip.livejournal.com
*shakes head* This is just a new name for what's going on already. Look at some of the requirements pages.

My undergrad career was basically "platforms" plus "intelligence", plus a little meandering for history and spanish classes.

As it stands now, you can get out without doing anything C-like or systems-y after 2200... this hardly different.

Profile

alexr_rwx: (Default)
Alex R

May 2022

S M T W T F S
1234 567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 21st, 2025 02:21 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios